
Just when you thought it was safe to take a few deep breaths and revel in the post-election calm, municipal leaders go and make their own bid for the headlines.
Last night's special study session at the Aurora Municipal Center, nicknamed the "Hopper" session for its theme of narrowing down cost savings solutions, saw a new direction in the city council's continued discussion regarding its budget woes.
It was a plan that could draw the ire of book and pool lovers alike.
Here's the bottom line: the city is spending more than it's making, a structural shortcoming in the budget that's made balancing a headache for the past five years or so. As the local financial outlook darkens for the coming year, and as the problem becomes more pronounced, city leaders are scrambling for ways to cut costs.
The latest proposal? A plan that would cut city funding to the city's libraries and recreation, leaving their ultimate fate to the voters and their willingness to pay more.
Want to keep your neighborhood pool? Want to keep your favorite Aurora library open for business? The funding structure to keep them alive - a special district, most likely - would have to come with increased taxes.
While Aurora Mayor Ed Tauer was quick to stress that such a solution wasn't final, he also urged swift action. What's more, the suggestion saw little dissent from the rest of the city council.
"We'll have to make some real clear decisions - there's probably something that we'll need to stop doing that we're doing today," Tauer said. "We need to create a real impact on the budget, and not in two years, but in the next nine to 12 months."
Speaking of the need for special district, Tauer said the burden of the decision of saving libraries and rec centers could fall squarely to the voters - and their willingness to pay a heftier tab.
"Essentially, they make the decision. We're going to reduce services here to make sure we keep them strong in our highest priority," Tauer said, referring to public safety and police services.
"As we do that, if you don't want us to make that cut, it's OK ... If you don't want it, we have to increase some kind of tax to take care of it."
The discussion of cuts was tempered by a separate discussion, one that sought new avenues to encourage business in the city. By tweaking the city's current business application and permitting processes, city councilors want to make Aurora one of the most attractive sites for new businesses in the West.
For all the positive discussion about new business in Aurora, the prospect of the special district stood out as one of the boldest measures to address the city's structural budget problem. The mere mention of closing libraries and pools has brought out the ire of citizens during recent months, and this new plan may very well prove to be a hard sell.
Indeed, while it seems that leaders are betting on the likely approval of special districts, the very prospect of an Aurora sans libraries or rec centers is surreal. As a native of the city, one of my earliest memories is standing at the counter in the Aurora Central Library beside my mother in 1983, straining to see across the counter to the reams of books hidden behind the clerk. Seeing that resource disappear in the face of current budget woes would alter the cultural and physical landscape of the city immeasurably.
As Tauer emphasized, the special district plan is not written in stone, and voters may agree to contribute more in the form of property taxes in order to save these facilities. After all, the recent passage of the APS bond initiative shows that citizens are willing to pay for important civic priorities, even in tough times.
But the question remains: In this weak economy, would a proposed tax hike to save these resources survive? Would citizens' already-strapped pocketbooks allow such an added expenditure? Would the future of libraries and rec centers in the city be assured?