The program, which would provide about $4.5 million to rehabilitate abandoned and foreclosed homes, sparked pointed debate from councilmembers.
Councilman Steve Hogan voiced a preference for an approach that would stress demolition and future development of properties in lieu of reconstruction, an option he said would cost more money and transform less property.
Joseph Garcia, director of community development for the city, said that while the city has the power to demolish blighted property under the program, the priority would be rehabilitating and reselling homes.
After the debate, the council voted to move forward with the resolution as its written, with a stress on purchase, rehabilitation and reselling for use in a recycling fund.
No comments:
Post a Comment